Skip to main content

A Ounce of Prevention Equals a Pound of Cure

When To Perform Background Investigation

 

This article intends to highlight the drawback of performing the background investigation after the employment offer has been issued and accepted by the applicant.
The objective of doing a background investigation is not necessarily to discover who to hire but rather who not to hire because of information discovered during the background investigation. This discovery may reveal that the applicant didn’t have the credentials alleged on the application or has exhibited unacceptable dangerous behavior in the past or both.
A decision to do a background investigation is most likely done when you, as the employer, have a candidate to whom you would like to extend an employment offer. An employer can perform a background investigation on the individual during various stages during the hiring process. The major alternatives are either before the offer is extended or after the offer is extended to the individual.
NEWS FLASH!! Up to 8% of people in the workforce population have criminal convictions in their background and various studies indicate from 20% to 30% of prior employment and education may be falsified.
If an employer performs the background investigation before the employment offer is extended, the employer can be assured there are no falsifications on the employment application and no potentially dangerous behavior has occurred in the individual’s recent past. That’s a plus. The drawback is that the employer has unnecessarily incurred the cost of the background investigation should the applicant decide to not accept the employment offer.
In an attempt to avoid the cost of a background investigation if the applicant declines the employment offer, employers sometimes have a policy of performing the background investigation after the offer has been accepted by the applicant. Sounds efficient as long as nothing is discovered that indicates the applicant has falsified the employment application and also does not have unacceptable dangerous behavior in their past.
But, knowing that up to almost one-third of people falsify your employment application, do you really want to postpone doing the background investigation? An employer may think they are avoiding the $50 to $100 background investigation without realizing the cost of waiting and then discovering the individual has major “issues” in their background. Then you have incurred thousands of dollars of on-boarding costs and training only to discover you have to terminate the individual. And, the individual has already left their former position.
We would be glad to help you “run the numbers” to show that doing the background investigation before the offer makes immense economic and business sense in your particular situation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An uptick in Hiring, Importance of Background Screening

An uptick in Hiring, Importance of Background Screening -KG April 9, 2015 Although some states have changed their laws around medical and recreational marijuana use, more than half of 3,119 HR professionals surveyed said their organizations do not accommodate marijuana use in the workplace or plan to do so in the next year. That is among the findings of HR 2015 Employee Background Screening Benchmark Report, conducted in October and November 2014 with HR professionals responsible for employment screening and recruiting. “This is going to be one of the hottest topics of the year in terms of background screening: drug screening,” said Rachel Trindade, vice president of marketing at HR, a provider of employment background checks, drug and health screenings, and Form I-9 employment verification. Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia have legalized the possession of marijuana for medical use, and four states and the District of Columbia have legaliz
Post a Comment
Read more

Workplace Violence...Are you and your staff protected??

Workplace Violence: It Can Happen Anywhere HUMAN RESOURCES ARTICLE 08/04/2016 Varying degrees of workplace violence can happen anywhere, and at any time. According to  OSHA , nearly 2 million American workers report having been victims of workplace violence each year, yet many more cases go unreported. While there’s no standard or regulation applicable to workplace violence, OSHA does have a  General Duty Clause  that it enforces, which states among other things that each employer “shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death of serious physical harm to his employees.” While workplace violence may happen anywhere at any time, it may also be instigated by anyone. Violent behaviors may come from a white-collar employee, a blue-collar worker, or a third party–such as customers or an employee's partner. What are some common factors or warning signs to
1 comment
Read more

The pluses and pitfalls of background checks in the automotive field

January 14, 2019 12:00 AM The pluses and pitfalls of background checks Retailers must navigate various federal and state regs, experts say Anisa Jibrell Tweet Share Share Email Print AUTOMOTIVE NEWS ILLUSTRATION Especially for jobs involving handling money and customer information, background checks can be valuable, a dealership group official says. A decade ago when Scottsdale, Ariz., police uncovered a local fraud ring, they learned that breached information came from an unexpected source: an auto dealership finance manager. A background check likely would have paid off for the dealership, Henry Brown Buick-GMC-Pontiac in suburban Gilbert. But even though background checks may seem like an obvious way to protect dealerships from hiring untrustworthy employees, some dealerships don't use them. And dealerships that do rely on background checks must navigate a complex w
Post a Comment
Read more