Skip to main content

Retailers losing Millions do due Theft

How much do stores lose from theft?
Peter Baskerville

It just goes to show that there is someone somewhere conducting a study into something the makes the world tick when "The Barometer" conducts a comprehensive global study into the cost of merchandise theft for the retail industry in 2013-2014 right here - The Barometer

That particular report puts the global shrinkage rate (loss from shoplifting, staff theft, supplier fraud) at 1.29% of sales turnover which is lower than what I experienced in the 10 years I worked in an Australian department store in the 80s where the figure was generally around the 2% mark. The report does say that if you add the cost of theft prevention to the cost of actual theft, you get rate of 1.81% of sales.

Some interesting statistics that come out of the report include:
  • While shoplifting is the biggest reason for theft at 39% of all losses, the dishonest employee is not far behind at 28%.
  • Mexico has the greatest loss from theft, while Norway has the lowest.
  • The low priced discounters suffer the highest theft rate. Go figure!
  • Retailers add their anticipated loss from theft to their prices, which means that the honest shopper is paying a theft tax of $63.56 per person per year.
  • In the USA the age demographic of the most prolific shoplifter is 18-30 (42%) and the peak season for shoplifting is the Christmas/end of year holiday period (72%)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An uptick in Hiring, Importance of Background Screening

An uptick in Hiring, Importance of Background Screening -KG April 9, 2015 Although some states have changed their laws around medical and recreational marijuana use, more than half of 3,119 HR professionals surveyed said their organizations do not accommodate marijuana use in the workplace or plan to do so in the next year. That is among the findings of HR 2015 Employee Background Screening Benchmark Report, conducted in October and November 2014 with HR professionals responsible for employment screening and recruiting. “This is going to be one of the hottest topics of the year in terms of background screening: drug screening,” said Rachel Trindade, vice president of marketing at HR, a provider of employment background checks, drug and health screenings, and Form I-9 employment verification. Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia have legalized the possession of marijuana for medical use, and four states and the District of Columbia have legaliz...

Why Drug Testing is Important?

Why Drug Testing Is Important September 28, 2015 TDT Although many aspects of society are harmed by illicit drug use and abuse, it is especially detrimental in the workplace. Not only can it lower the productivity and revenue of a business, but it can also place employees at risk. In fact, depending on the line of work, the drug abuse of an employee could have fatal consequences. Luckily, employers these days are able to test for illicit drug use and implement strategies to pursue drug-free workplaces. Today we’re discussing why drug testing is important and how to employ it effectively. Why Drug Testing Is Important Safety. Drug use can impair a person’s judgment and increase safety risks. This is especially concerning in certain industries, such as construction, in which using drugs or alcohol at work could cause an injury or even a fatality. As employee drug abuse causes as much as 50% of all on-the-job accidents (source), this is not a matter to be taken...

4 Significant Risks Your Company Takes When Background Check Are Not a Part of Your Hiring Process

4 Significant Risks Your Company Takes When Background Check Are Not a Part of Your Hiring Process Talent acquisition and talent management both require a huge investment of time and resources, so it makes sense to do your due diligence before bringing a new hire on board. First and foremost? Make sure that the person is exactly who they are claiming to be. This includes confirming what’s stated on résumés—from education to work experience to certifications and awards—as well as verifying the criminal history of the individual. Doing so will reveal any red flags that could potentially affect trust, safety, and your company’s bottom line. But if you don’t confirm how a person is representing themselves, and make a poorly-informed hiring decision as a result, it could be incredibly costly to your company—in more ways than one. According to Fast Company, one-quarter of companies surveyed estimated that a bad hire cost them at least $50,000 in the past year. A bad hire results in l...